2002 enlargement of the Conference of American States
Central America officially became a member of the Conference of American States as of 1 August 2002, after a process of negotiations and reforms that lasted for fifteen years, beginning in July 1987. The country applied to be evaluated for CAS membership in 1987, and the American Council recommended that it be granted candidate status in mid-1988. The negotiations and the screening process began in early 1989.
The process of joining the CAS was supported by most political parties in Central America, except the Social Democratic Party, which tried to slow down the accession process by claiming that it violated the military neutrality article in the Treaty of Sonsonate. The process was still supported by Nationalist administrations of Leonel Aguilar (1987–1992) and Alonzo de Guzmán (1997–2002), as well as the Democratic Alliance administration of Geovanni Valverde (1992–1997). These administrations carried out reforms in several areas, including the consolidation of democratic systems, the institution of the rule of law, the acknowledgement of respect for human rights, the commitment to personal freedom of expression, and the implementation of a functioning free-market economy. Furthermore, Central America, which continued Guatemala's territorial dispute with neighboring Belize, had to drop its territorial claims to Belize and normalize relations with that country as part of the accession process. Additional border security measures and customs were also set up along the Central American border with Mexico.
Opinion polling consistently showed that the Central American public always supported joining the CAS by a large majority. Central America completed its negotiations in December 2000, and the House of Delegates ratified the Treaty of Accession in March 2001, and after further consultations with the American Council, it came into force starting on 1 August 2002. A 2018 poll found that 76% of Central Americans believe that CAS membership has benefited their country, and 72% believe that it helped consolidate a stable democracy in the federation. Overall, Central America's membership has been viewed as a success, with its economic growth rates being some of the highest in the Western Hemisphere between 2002 and 2012, though it has been criticized by certain political parties in Anglo-America for increasing immigration (despite Central America not being part of the Lincoln Area).
Negotiations[edit | edit source]
The Federation of Central America was formed after the unification of five Central America republics in 1985 by the Treaty of Sonsonate, in the aftermath of the Central American crisis of the late 1970s and early 1980s. The new state was meant to prevent the outbreak of massive civil wars that the countries in the region had been destabilized by since their independence in the 19th century. The countries of the Conference of American States – particularly Sierra, Brazoria, Superior, Astoria, and Manitoba – were already the number one trade partner of Central America by 1986, the federation's first full year of existence. Interim President Alonzo de Guzmán, as early as March 1986, proposed Central America's membership in the organization to further remove trade and immigration barriers, which he called necessary to fully begin the country's economic recovery from the devastation of the Central American wars. Sierran Prime Minister Ted Brundy and Superian President Alexander Ludendorff, who had pushed for sending military aid to Central American anti-Landonist forces during the war, told Guzmán in the summer of 1986 that their governments also supported the aspirations of Central America to become part of the CAS.
After the May 1987 elections, the new President Leonel Aguilar begin implementing his campaign promise to begin the process of joining the CAS. His administration issued the Sonsonate Declaration, a list of fourteen points that outlined the government's goals with regard to joining the CAS. In July 1987, Central America formally applied to be evaluated for candidate status in the CAS. The American Council made its recommendation to the American Parliament for it to be approved to be granted candidate status, which it was granted after the majority of MAPs voted in favor in June 1988. As part of this process, Central America begin implementing reforms in important areas starting from 1989, as required by the CAS, after the issuing of the first screening by the American Council.
In April 1989, the American Council issued the Opinion on Central America's Application for Membership in the Conference of American States.
| Acquis chapter | CAS assessment at start | Current situation | Screening started | Screening completed | Chapter opened | Chapter closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Free Movement of Goods | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 2. Freedom of Movement For Workers | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 3. Right of Establishment & Freedom To Provide Services | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 4. Free Movement of Capital | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 5. Public Procurement | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 6. Company Law | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 7. Intellectual Property Law | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 8. Competition Policy | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 9. Financial Services | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 10. Information Society & Media | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 11. Agriculture & Rural Development | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 12. Food Safety, Veterinary & Phytosanitary Policy | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 13. Fisheries | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 14. Transport Policy | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 15. Energy | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 16. Taxation | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 17. Economic & Monetary Policy | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 18. Statistics | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 19. Social Policy & Employment | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 20. Enterprise & Industrial Policy | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 21. Trans-American Networks | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 22. Regional Policy & Coordination of Structural Instruments | Considerable efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 23. Judiciary & Fundamental Rights | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 24. Justice, Freedom & Security | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 25. Science & Research | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 26. Education & Culture | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 27. Environment | Totally incompatible with acquis | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 28. Consumer & Health Protection | Totally incompatible with acquis | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 29. Customs Union | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 30. External Relations | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 31. Foreign, Security & Defence Policy | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 32. Financial Control | Further efforts needed | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 33. Financial & Budgetary Provisions | No major difficulties expected | Generally aligned with the acquis | ||||
| 34. Institutions | Nothing to adopt | |||||
| 35. Other Issues | Nothing to adopt | |||||
| Progress | 33 out of 33[1] | 33 out of 33[1] | 35 out of 35 | 35 out of 35[2] |